A Peek inside Kerry’s “Peace” Efforts or Propaganda?

A Peek inside Kerry’s “Peace” Efforts or Propaganda?

By Sam Bahour

The first proclaimed leak from Secretary John Kerry’s
efforts to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, as it is so often called,
were published last week in the reputable London-based daily Arabic newspaper,
Al-Hayat. The source is said to be a posting
on the website of the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas, who
claim the information was leaked to them by someone attending the tightly
closed negotiating sessions. The validity of this claim and the contents of the
leak are unverifiable and the infighting between Hamas and Fatah give both a
vested interest to publicly damage the other; however, a read through the supposed
leaked information makes anyone familiar with this issue take worrying note.

The Al-Hayat article on the
leak states that Secretary Kerry obtained Palestinian President Abbas’ approval
on general parameters for the restart of negotiations, at meetings between the
two in Amman on 17-18 July 2013, prior to Secretary Kerry’s
announcement that negotiations would restart. According to the leaked document,
“Kerry set a maximum period of
time ranging from
6 to 9 months to be dedicated to bilateral Palestinian-Israeli negotiations … without any preconditions,” beyond the principles listed
below and whereby Jordan participates in meetings on refugees, Jerusalem and borders where necessary:

1. “The Separation Wall will serve as the security
   borders of the ‘Jewish’ state, and the temporary border of the ‘Palestinian’
   state… Both parties will acknowledge and announce this.” 
2. There will be “an exchange in disputed
   territories within the plan of the Separation Wall noted above, as agreed
   to by both parties and with the blessing of the Arab League Follow-up
   Committee, as specified by this Committee to Mr. Kerry during their last
   visit to Washington, ranging in size from eight to ten percent of West
   Bank lands.”
3. There will be also be a “freeze in the settlement
   projects at a number of outposts, as approved by the Israeli government, which
   does not apply to existing projects in large settlement communities located
   in the vicinity of Jerusalem and in the Jordan Valley, including the
   settlements of Ma’ale Adumim, Givat Ze’ev, Har Homa, Gilo, Neve Yacov, Ramat
   Shlomo, Ramat Alman, Kiryat Arba’, and other densely populated
   settlements.”
4. The document adds that “residents in frozen
   settlement communities will have the right to choose between Israeli
   citizenship or Palestinian citizenship, or both, at the conclusion of
   negotiations,” and that “talks will culminate with a historic agreement
   … along the lines of the Oslo Agreement, during which both parties will
   announce the end of the historic conflict between their peoples, as well
   as full normalization with all Arab states, at a celebratory meeting
   attended by the Arab League and representatives of all Arab countries, announcing
   their approval of Israel’s establishment of a Palestinian state within the
   limits set out … above, according to agreements…. concluded by the two
   parties at the end of the negotiations, which will also entail Palestinian
   recognition of Israel as the state of the Jewish people.”
5. It adds that “at the end of negotiations, some
   Palestinian families will be allowed to reunite in the West Bank, Rafah
   and Gaza, while others will have the right to compensation, or emigration …
   to Arab countries, especially the Gulf…” where they will be “…naturalized…
   utilizing the  Right of Return Fund
   for this purpose.”
6. Concerning the status of East Jerusalem, the
   leaked document indicates that it will be “placed under an
   international administration (Palestinian-Israeli-Jordanian) for ten years,
   whereby  resident Israelis in East
   Jerusalem will have the right  to
   choose their identity,” i.e. citizenship. 
7. Furthermore, “Israelis and Palestinians agree to
   discuss the issue of land exchanges in the West Bank and Jerusalem through
   negotiating committees despite the non-core points of contention between
   the two parties… especially those points that are considered important by
   the delegation of the Arab League, including the proposal to grant
   citizenship to every Palestinian who has been resident in the Gulf for more
   than ten years.”
8. The document indicates that there will be a “discussion
   of executive steps in this agreement during negotiations within the time-limit
   mentioned above, and that its implementation will extend to ten years from
   the signing of the agreement.”
9. Israel will also “release a number of
   Palestinian detainees who have spent twenty years or more in detention,
   and no longer pose a security threat.”
10. It also stipulates that “President Mahmoud
    Abbas will call for legislative and presidential elections in the West Bank
    after the public announcement of the Agreement, in anticipation of the
    possibility of the emergence of objections to it, and that the terms of
    the agreement will not fully be announced until after the start of negotiations
    and the preoccupation of Palestinians with the battles of the Legislative
    Council and the Presidency.”
11. It also says that “with the signing of the
    agreement at the end of the specified time-limit and the declaration of an
    independent Palestinian state, the Palestinians and Jordanians will, with
    the blessing of Israel and the Arabs, reach an understanding on the role of
    Jordanian security assistance … to the Palestinian Authority … to stand by
    its side and help it overcome potential internal or external dangers … as
    part of a Confederation, which will be announced in conjunction with a
    trilateral economic initiative, in whose formation Israel will play an active role.”

Shocking, to say the least!

If the U.S. and Israel continue to choose the game of might is right,
then they should expect, sooner rather than later, a new generation of
Palestinians to look Israel straight in the eye and say, “You win! You get it all,
Israel: Israel, the West
Bank, Gaza, Jerusalem
– both east and west sides, all the settlements, all the water, all the JordanValley, all the electromagnetic spectrum, all the airspace, and
most importantly, you also get all of us. Now, we heard you have free health
care in Israel; where do we pick up our medical cards? We also want
some of that free education.”

In other words, if the U.S. and Israel are adamant on throwing international law,
humanitarian law, UN resolutions, human rights, rights of refugees, and sheer common
sense into the sea, then they should expect the Palestinians to redefine their
self-determination from a struggle for statehood to a struggle for civil rights
between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River.

In the words of the late
Palestinian and global intellectual, Edward Said, it’s “equality or nothing.”
What is it about these three simple words that is so hard to comprehend?

~ Sam Bahour is a Palestinian-American business development
consultant from Youngstown, Ohio, living in the
Palestinian city of Al-Bireh in the West Bank. He frequently
provides independent commentary on Palestine and serves as a
policy advisor of Al-Shabaka, the
Palestinian Policy Network. He is co-author of HOMELAND: Oral
Histories of Palestine and Palestinians
(1994) and blogs at http://www.epalestine.com.

By Topic

Tagged with: Benjamin Netanyahu • HAMAS • John Kerry • leak • Mahmoud Abbas • Peace Talks, Processes, and Agreements • Two State Solution

Explore the site in BY TOPIC, A-Z.